Who knows if it'll work -- likely not. But Romney 2012 centralized a lot of "ground game" stuff and it ended up being a disaster.
-
-
-
Despite shrieks otherwise, delegating grassroots organizing to state/local parties who actually know the terrain is a pretty normal strategy
-
There's this misplaced media tendency to cast everything Trump does as baffling or abnormal: even the utterly banal, conventional stuff
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
right, but there are significant drawbacks to that
-
There were drawbacks to Romney centralizing the 2012 campaign too. Either way it's wrong to say he "has no ground game"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
True, but experience suggest a POTUS GG offers better advocacy; state parties can have competing/conflicting downballot interests.
-
Also, many state/local parties are chronically under-resourced, a POTUS cmpgn offers a critical injection of $/logistics/enthusiasm
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
believe the ground game when Trump vans start showing up at Black Churches.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
and it's much more efficient and lean.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There are good reasons for pres candidates not to do that. Incl: quality inconsistent, no guarantee P cand is focus/even mentioned.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.