Its easy for a far left white person to say "Clinton shouldnt criticize those alt right racists" when you haven't faced actual racism
I described a likely effect of her action. That's different from a statement of "should" or "should not."
-
-
I do not support HRC, so why would I presume to offer her tactical advice? That'd be disingenuous.
-
But you've demonstrated determination to characterize her efforts as harmful. This is an absurd stretch.
@markwwilsonmd@Nebula63
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Doesn't matter. Describing likely harm leads to an implied position about what she should or shouldn't do.
@markwwilsonmd@Nebula63 -
No it doesn't. I'm stating that's not the implication.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Seems like distinction w/o difference. Minimizing their power helps give them shelter. You shouldn't do it
@markwwilsonmd@Nebula63Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Disingenuous would be worrying publicly re effects because you realize it's tactically smart.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.