Have the Clinton loyalists screaming "no evidence of quid pro quo!" ever studied the basics of how government corruption functionally works?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's worth noting: the optics of quid pro quo is all that's necessary for a conflict of interest to arise.pic.twitter.com/GFHKd5eNrd
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And we've been hearing about the Clinton's corruption for over 20 years! Enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also: regardless of whether you can prove quid pro quo, it's unethical behavior.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
until he endorsed Hillary and started mimicking her behaviors...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
or wasn't until he got involved with hillary..!!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
but isn't it all just optics, by which I mean pundit managed optical illusions, anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the only election that made sense was Sanders to the left and Hillary moving right but that was not realistic either yay 2016
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.