Have the Clinton loyalists screaming "no evidence of quid pro quo!" ever studied the basics of how government corruption functionally works?
-
-
This is why many wanted Bernie: supporting him did not require endless, convoluted rationalizations for why he's
#actually not corrupt - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
they're not even pundits at this point, just cheerleaders
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@mtracey@ZephyrTeachout You don't need evidence to bring a lawsuit, just standing & reasonable argu. Evidence comes in during discovery. 1 -
.
@mtracey@ZephyrTeachout This per Jared Beck of JamPAC.us in this recent Molyneux interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ktseCdBnyg …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@mtracey@ZephyrTeachout: No need 4 evidence 2investigate poss crime or even go 2trial w/criminal case if circumstantial evidence strong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.