Have the Clinton loyalists screaming "no evidence of quid pro quo!" ever studied the basics of how government corruption functionally works?
-
-
SCOTUS later overturned the conviction, but that's not the point. Pundits should talk to experts like
@ZephyrTeachout before spouting off. -
This is why many wanted Bernie: supporting him did not require endless, convoluted rationalizations for why he's
#actually not corrupt - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Didn't u know quid pro quos involve envelopes of money being handed under table, any table, and the recipient replying "i'll do it"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.