Enjoyable new talking point for why the Clinton Foundation must remain operational: there'd be a sudden wave of mass death were it to close
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
curious: would you object if it continued to operate just off current capital/interest? No new donations?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rencer_speed
Even then there'd be ample opportunity for influence-peddling. Should be shuttered completely.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
you mean because of foreign governments allowing/supporting operations? I think I agree with you, but what about Trump businesses?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rencer_speed
What about them? I am not commenting on Trump here.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
seems that they're much more prone to conflicts of interest and much more complicated to shutter, so it seems relevant
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @rencer_speed
OK? So I'll comment on that specifically when I see fit.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
I'm just saying, you often bring up criticisms of Clinton in response to attacks on Trump, which I think is fair but cuts both ways
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @rencer_speed
The never-ending impulse to pivot from HRC to Trump, or visa versa, is maddening and corrosive.
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
are you disagreeing with my assessment that it's something you do?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
ok then, I'll agree to disagree as I don't feel like trawling your TL at the moment
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.