In a healthy party, the liabilities of the Clinton Foundation would have been aired during the primary, but Sanders declined to raise them.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
Drip-drip-drip news about Foundation conflicts have the appearance of being shocking revelations; but this could've been litigated long ago.
3 replies 34 retweets 63 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Instead, Dem party actors totally circled the wagons around HRC, so her flaws were never adequately adjudicated during the primary process.
3 replies 51 retweets 84 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
There was much talk, rightly, about GOP institutional pathologies, but Dems' pathologies were just as apparent and (likely) self-destructive
1 reply 16 retweets 40 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
Sanders declining to raise the Foundation issues wasn't purely a function of his own tactical misapprehension (though it was partly that)
4 replies 20 retweets 49 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
It was primarily a function of the institutional incentives that had coalesced to insulate HRC and make harsh criticism of her untenable.
5 replies 25 retweets 60 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
but it was ok for Bernie to say she wasn't fit to be Pres?
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He was correct to say that, but he never unleashed sustained, harsh criticism. Too little too late.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.