That's such a facile reading of the situation, it's not even worth responding to.
-
-
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
would you say the same about Breitbart?
-
and not disagreeing with your previous statement. I certainly fall in the category of only peripherally aware of gawkers work.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm sure every publication has done quality pieces Mike but at what threshold does that bad destroy the good?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
.
@mtracey I didn't hate Gawker.However outing people & illegally violating avg citizens' privacy does have legitimate place in our courts.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Gawker is sensational but they have actually broken stories that the Corporate media won't touch
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I read and commented on Gawker for almost 10 years. It's journalism, such as it was, deteriorated over the years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
the best proof it did journalism is that it's now dead
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
So conflicted over this. Like I am over buzzfeed who uses click bait to fund their actual journalism.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Gawker often does better journalism than the professional journalists.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
what about breitbart
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.