The fact that they addressed random documents that nobody cares about rather than substance speaks to the story's strength.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Sourced"? They cite each other in a massive circle-jerk. What a pathetic argument to authority.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@daveweigel Just to be sure, that's a slam on Clinton owning the clown msm. Right?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Cool story, bro. In other news, NYT is "ostensibly" a valid source, and Refugees are "ostensibly" fleeing war.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
HRC examined by her personal friend of 15 years, and only has allergies. isn't that enough? Jk.
- 2 more replies
-
-
-
Yeah, "Old women get sick", what a fringe notion, right?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, people are going to fill an information vacuum with speculation. The information vacuum is the root problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So you'll say she's too old (cuz you're Mr. Neutral), but oppose anything that makes her less qualified than Trump?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Who are you arguing with? A hallucination? I said read, not believe, but you won't even consider. (muh sources)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Tons of great journalism"? Stop shilling, its embarrassing for both of us, and I won't humor you.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@WNC4Bernie
@daveweigel Just answer why she is making the crazy facesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.