The stifling, dangerous heat at the Trump rally yesterday in CT could expose Trump and/or the facility to civil liability. It was that bad.
-
-
It's true that you "could leave at any time" but the place was so packed that opportunity for egress was constricted. Or so one might argue.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
meanwhile Trump is 70 yrs old up there with a suit on giving a speech in front of 1000's no problem. If ppl dint feel good, leave
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
something tells me that facilities in Connecticut aren't equipped to handle 100° heat waves — it set a record high temperature
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not really. The facility if it accomodates bands or similar events could have had cooling stations, but people can leave, too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Would never pass muster. What duty did he have to voluntary attendees? The heat was obvious. Attendees accepted the risk.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Highly doubt that. For a free, voluntary event that you could leave at anytime.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Are you an attorney? No one FORCED rally goers in remain in the gym. They chose to stay or go. Give it a rest.
@mtraceyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How did Trump allow it? He knew in advance?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.