-
-
Replying to @EricBoehlert
The tweet is accurate as
@MattGertz himself agreed: not my fault the Clintons give their various entities similar names4 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @EricBoehlert
Matthew Gertz Retweeted Michael Tracey
I mean, the argument informed by your error is wrong, iehttps://twitter.com/mtracey/status/764148507091492864 …
Matthew Gertz added,
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @MattGertz @EricBoehlert
No, that's also right. Doling out donations under the banner of the Clinton Foundation furthers political interests
4 replies 1 retweet 12 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @EricBoehlert
So does doling out donations under their own names. They are political figures. Donations make them look good.
3 replies 1 retweet 15 likes -
Replying to @MattGertz @EricBoehlert
So we agree that the tax-deductible donations further their political interests. Excellent.
6 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
And I did know the Family Foundation existed, having read the CNBC article I linked as well as other material.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Clinton Foundation" is not the full name of the other foundation either -- they're both shorthand.
5 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Oh come on, you can't actually believe that argumentpic.twitter.com/a1r6xKo0Dj
2 replies 1 retweet 8 likes
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @johansilentio__ @mtracey and
instead of admitting he thought it was to the famous foundation, does this.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes - 1 more reply
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.