Uh, was this previously known? Kind of a big deal... http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/09/politics/hillary-clinton-emails-judicial-watch/ …pic.twitter.com/mScVqmHQl8
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I know these are very rude questions and don't explicitly involve condemning Trump, but maybe they're nonetheless worth looking into.
CNN has dramatically revised the wording of this paragraph (without notation) since I first tweeted a screenshotpic.twitter.com/7RsUMtGjKO
If Hillary Clinton doesn't give the US House GOP what they want, they have grounds to begin inquiry that leads to impeachment.
@mtracey
It's the two worded question, the answer for which explains pretty much everything -- "Who Decides?"
@EvolveQuickly wouldn't questions like that require them to hire journalists? Novel idea.
I never take @CNN's word for anything. Not even when I'd like to.
I'm reading it was Lynch who opposed it, same Lynch who met Bill Clinton on the tarmac #HillaryHealth
Seriously? Source? Wouldn't surprise me...
Also who requested the investigation. @mtracey
I thought DOJ deferred to the FBI when it came down to prosecutorial discretion? Or is that only for special crimes?
that's rhetorical. CNN only delves into serious topics such as plagiarism & presidential assassination threats
@BWV_54 Your girl Debbie Wasserman Schultz, and your boy Bernie lol. RUKM
Bro, that would mean doing actual JOURNalism. Not gonna happen at @CNN
Would be really cool if you would investigate, and not on Twitter. Maybe hit the streets and start asking ?s
Why no elaboration by @CNN ...
Come on, you know the answer to that question.
@mtracey @Vallissimapic.twitter.com/tB3FTrPX3l
Don't waste your breath.
@CNN
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.