your use innuendo and smear to make your points. Sorry Clinton hasn't passed your purity test.
-
-
Replying to @jasoncherkis
Stating that she lied is not an innuendo or smear, it's fact. And I'm not concerned about "purity."
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @jasoncherkis
In your view, did she or did she not repeatedly deceive the public?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
here's your boy actually being caught lying 30 times in just one depo https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/trump-lies/ …
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jasoncherkis
I've said over and over again that I oppose Trump. This is desperate.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
your response to every legit Trump scandal is but Clinton lied about her damn emails. It's tiresome.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jasoncherkis
That's so false. I've addressed countless Trump issues on their own merits. You're the one pivoting from HRC to Trump.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @jasoncherkis
I've asked if you agree that she lied, and you send me articles about "my boy" in a deposition. And link me to Hannity.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
You refuse to answer the question about whether HRC deceived the public, which has nothing to do with Trump.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @jasoncherkis
So just to be clear: in a thread about HRC's pattern of deception, you reply with unrelated Trump stories.
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @jasoncherkis
And then accuse me of "changing the subject." Just want to put that out there.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.