I have no idea. But could Clinton be more transparent? Absolutely.
-
-
Replying to @jasoncherkis
It's not just a matter of needing to "be more transparent," it's that she actively and repeatedly deceived the public.
2 replies 12 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
jasoncherkis Retweeted
you have good company https://twitter.com/seanhannity/status/763243828543426560 …
jasoncherkis added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jasoncherkis
So noting the obvious fact that HRC repeatedly lied puts me in the company of Sean Hannity? Really?
4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
your use innuendo and smear to make your points. Sorry Clinton hasn't passed your purity test.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @jasoncherkis
Stating that she lied is not an innuendo or smear, it's fact. And I'm not concerned about "purity."
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @jasoncherkis
In your view, did she or did she not repeatedly deceive the public?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
you hold her to a higher standard than Trump. I get it. You hate her.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @jasoncherkis
I'm truly perplexed as to why you won't answer my question.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Uh, yes I do. My answer is yes, based on the easily-attainable public record. What's your answer?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.