thank you
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Problem with repurposing what had been conventional GOP dogma as "fascism," like Katz does here: 1) dilutes meaning of term 2) sows hysteria
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yeah, they'll be the first to call for some extra-legal measure to block Trump from assuming office.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wasn't presuming to invalidate your conclusion. I was pointing to your proclamation as an example of what I just wrote about.
-
If you genuinely believe Trump to be a fascist, are you prepared to fight? Use violent tactics if necessary?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Uh, I didn't subtweet you, and the fact that you assume I did is pretty vain. I just replied directly to you several times.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"This is what I mean by pulling implications out of your ass." That sentence is not responsive to my question.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're the one who just blithely declared that a presidential candidate is fascist. So the burden is on you to prove that claim
-
And that claim, if proven, would entail you to take certain acts to prevent the ascendance of fascism, of out moral duty.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
The aim of the post wasn't to disprove the validity of the fascism label.
-
It was to suggest that using the term compels a certain set of acts, which proponents of the label don't seem to want to accept
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you are willing to throw the "fascism" charge around, but unwilling to accept the implications, there's a discrepancy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Since you do apparently think that: what actions, if any, does holding said position morally compel you to take?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because I made a case using logic and reason for why those *would be* the implications. They are obviously not universal truths
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'll ask again: what are your obligations in view of your contention that a fascist could soon take over the US government?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The fact that you steadfastly refuse to answer this question is telling, and gives me confidence in the validity of my argument
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Again, if you don't answer the very straightforward question I posed, I consider this discussion to have reached a conclusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. You're deflecting. Discussion hereby terminated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because I was expanding on a point made in the very same thread. I obviously replied to you repeatedly. Such a trivial hangup.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.