Instead of unthinkingly embracing their support, Dems would do well to ponder why all the most virulent "natsec" hawks are rushing to HRC.
-
-
I think eventually. But the immediate motivation is predictability. Without it no one gets rich.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
Trump is wildcard. Hillary is guaranteed beltway banditry and bureaucratic CYA.
#JohnsonWeld2016 provides some reformist hope.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
@TheVoiceOfPaulR ..How might it be that Trump may be the greater danger.?.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@ThankYouBernie makes one think Donald
#Drumpf's presence in this race isn't entirely coincidental@jimmy_doreThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What is more cruel: not letting Muslims immigrate to the US or bombing them in their countries?
-
Bombing them. Most of them immigrate reluctantly, not necessarily happily.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Money brotha, its not that difficult to understand. Clinton keeps the status quo, even for elite Repubs. They know what they getn.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Job security. She's a serial killer. Her wars will keep them paid and suitably busy w/wars & regime changes - and all that entails
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trump, like HRC, is bellicose, but Trump's not strategic, pays little heed to natsec web of alliances -- and he's a racist hothead.
-
With Trump, there's no ideology that natsec folks can count on. Their positions wouldn't be as stable as w/ bipartisan natsec state
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.