Spoke to several people this week at the DNC who wield influence in the Bernie orbit and believe HRC would be more destructive than Trump.
-
-
what does this mean? What analysis supports the idea that Clinton would be more destructive than Trump? Not denial, just curious.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
i think it comes down to how you solve the math of how effective each politician will be at implementing bad stuff
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it certainly is possible HRC will be worse. I don't want to go to war over Latvia or Crimea.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
feel like most people are gonna go with the denial. It's worked great for them so far
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
a plausible leap to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not surprising really. What primary reasons did they have for this belief? Trade policy? Foreign policy? & were they Dem. B4?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Well to be fair, when the Democratic candidate is more of a hawk than the Republican and has neocons endorse them, something is off
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The foreign policy difference between them is remarkable. Other than ISIS, Trump is like a Ron Paul level of anti-interventionist
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I support
@DrJillStein but was rooting for Bernie. I believe both HRC and Drumpf would both AT LEAST continue current destructionThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.