After DNC leaks, will any of the countless pundits who chastised Sanders supporters for calling the process "rigged" go back and recant?
-
-
Getting the support of the entire institutional party, along with state party affiliates, is a *massive* structural advantage in primaries.
-
You can call that "rigged" or something else; point is, it was collusion in favor of one candidate by powerful, ostensibly neutral bodies.
-
"Rigged" is a shorthand descriptor for structural problems. That's what Warren did last night. And that's what Sanders supporters always did
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
my only question is what tangible benefits HRC got? What Bernie voters voted for her due to non-tangible benefits?
-
The overt backing of the institutional party, along with state party affiliates, is a MASSIVE advantage in primaries/caucuses.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Ya'lready know the answer to that. Arrogance has been a core facet of the Hillary support base, why Bernie got a foothold to start.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The pundits are an integral part of this corrupt establishment that's doing the rigging. You expect them to turn on themselves?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.