After DNC leaks, will any of the countless pundits who chastised Sanders supporters for calling the process "rigged" go back and recant?
-
-
There was always a bad faith, strawman-type misreading by pro-Hillary pundits about what Sanders supporters meant when they said "rigged!"
-
So are those scolding pundits going to modify their positions in the face of new evidence? Or stay as recalcitrant as ever? YOU DECIDE...
-
Getting the support of the entire institutional party, along with state party affiliates, is a *massive* structural advantage in primaries.
-
You can call that "rigged" or something else; point is, it was collusion in favor of one candidate by powerful, ostensibly neutral bodies.
-
"Rigged" is a shorthand descriptor for structural problems. That's what Warren did last night. And that's what Sanders supporters always did
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Insurgent political candidate not favored by institutional establishment, also water is wet.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@mtracey@andrewfader wait, you're saying that the Democratic Party had bias toward the Democrat? WHEN DID POLITICS GET SO SHADY?!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.