The leaks are still significant in their own right. DNC officials, who have an obligation to the public, repeatedly lied about their role.
-
-
-
To instill confidence in their handling of the primary process, DNC officials said over and over again that they'd be unwaveringly neutral.
-
We now have certifiable proof that those claims were outright lies. The newsworthiness of the story should be self-explanatory.
-
The news value is only in doubt among people who have a vested interest in shielding HRC and/or the DNC from charges of malpractice.
-
This includes people who are in such hysterics over Trump that nothing other than monomaniacal Trump-bashing is acceptable until November.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know yet. My state in all likelihood will not be close.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
would you say it had some impact, though? Given that they coordinated hits against him and his campaign?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If DNC dirty tricks wasn't done to ensure Sanders lost, then why would they do it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
But I AM claiming we have a rigged system DESIGNED to suppress votes and favor victory of establishment candidates.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Makes you wonder what the DNC may have done to discourage other pols from running in '16.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.