Trump's NATO comments were (as usual) muddled & incoherent. But that's not what most bothered critics. It was his reticence to commit to war
-
-
The supposed danger of an "expansionist" Russia is being so blown out of proportion, it's incredible.
-
It is overblown but if you go around saying that the USA is weak & needs more $$ from allies, you invite attacks.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
But his stance here isn't even anti-war. He's willing to fight if allies chip in more money. He wants USA empire to make more $$.
-
If you'd prefer not to wage war because it'd be economically imprudent, that's still an "anti-war" stance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Sure, he refuses to commit to waging war, but he espouses ideas that will inextricably lead to war and oppression.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.