Note the logic: Everyone's actions anywhere in the US must be guided solely by a projected future electoral outcome https://twitter.com/deanbarker/status/754698574403862528 …
-
-
Personally, I've based all my actions for the last five years on the 2024 election. Do you want to elect one of the Romney sons?!?!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm against violent protests because I think they allow an unjust system to rationalize its violence. I prefer passive resistance.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
it's why so many Democrats I feel voted for the Iraq war don't want to be perceived as soft
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think if your goal is for Trump to lose in November, you should avoid doing things that will actually enable his winning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These people who demand that you tailor your every action based on the remotest chance it might help Trump, but ... (1/2)
-
2/2 ... how likely is it they're doing anything to stop Trump besides voting for HRC (& haranguing us to do so, not protest, etc)?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
His point holds true beyond electoral politics.
-
Violence is a very short term solution to a very long term problem in this case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
“Oh congrats Dr King, helping to get Nixon elected. Not a good look.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.