He's challenging the constitutionality of the requirement
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Voluntarily entering into an arrangement doesn't preclude one from arguing that the arrangement has unconstitutional features.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah, that's laid out in the lawsuit. Not sure what to make of it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Oh, he put that in there, I see. That's a catchall. 42 USC 1983 *is* the civil rights act of 1871. The relevant part anyway.
-
He specifically cited "Civil Rights Act of 1871"
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Not really, they always do this when they want to make a suit seem like a longshot. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's essentially a claim that if the language of the 1979 readoption of that civil rights act left out a private right of action,
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then it should come in under the original.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Silly, though, the only other part dealt with suspending habeas corpus IIRC.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then he should step down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
These morons need to stop playing games with our future and our children's future.. It's getting irritating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.