Disastrous SCOTUS decision today further diluting the exclusionary rule, running roughshod over the fourth amendment http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/14-1373_83i7.pdf …
-
-
Interesting tangential fact. None of this matters in Indiana, where they simply have no attenuation doctrine. Just isn't there.
-
Huh? It exists everywhere in the United States, given that the Supreme Court has established it.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I disagree with the doctrine. Illegal action should invalidate any evidence coming after. But given the doctrine? Right ruling.
-
Thomas fails to make an adequate case even given the doctrine.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
And frankly this wasn't ever going to be the court to do away with attenuation in the first place. Great dissent though.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.