If the AG suspects a person "is engaged, or has been engaged" in terrorism-related activity, why not bring formal charges?
-
-
-
Bottom line: this legislative short-cut lowers the evidentiary threshold for the Government to designate someone a Terrorist.
-
Further, the AG is not omniscient. Why is he/she the sole arbiter of whether a person is saddled with the life-destroying "Terrorist" label?
-
This is the kind of BS you get when the Senate is chock-full of former prosecutors and no defense attorneys.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The Attorney General as sole arbiter of rights?
-
Yeah, another dubious aspect of this.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
New conversation
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.