A person is not a "terrorist" by virtue of appearing on one of the Government's secret lists.https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/status/743230702070730752 …
-
-
Of course this will inevitably have disproportionate adverse impact on minorities, which DC liberals otherwise purport to care deeply about.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
New conversation -
-
-
but you are okay with
@NSA listening to your phone calls and conversations in your home? - End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
as gross as what happened in Orlando?
-
Ridiculous non sequitur.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
EVOKED** shit, I'm done
-
u can't mess with 5a. It's core of our democracy. What if a president put journos on a list & restricted their 1a?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, use of "Terror Gap" invokes the ugly history—cf. JFK "Missile Gap"—of this term being deployed to spread fear/misinformation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ISIS or not, the guy is a terrorist...he invoked terror...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To set stage for discussion, investigating person 2x on terrorism w/o action, b4 Orlando is: 1) process failure 2) personel failure
-
Unfortunately, I foresee a law allowing a person to be convicted a "Potential Terrorst" b4 action more dangerous than "secret list"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.