I'm not making a normative statement, only observing the development as symbolically significant.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It can, but it would be foolish to do so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm glad you agree with me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It may have been a mess but it still had symbolic significance. That's my only point.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wonder if English feminists were excited when Margaret Thatcher won? Having a hard time ignoring her shit policies to be excited.
-
Thatcher was symbolically significant by virtue of her being a woman. Not saying that justifies "excitement."
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Oh please.
-
Eh, it's the reality. Was the same for Obama. These people have massive platforms. It has an impact.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
at what distance away from you on the ideological spectrum does such a thing stop being inspiring
-
I'm not claiming that it should be inspiring. Would also be symbolically significant if Sarah Palin was a major party nominee.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Not nearly as symbolic had it been Caitlyn Jenner...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
.
@mtracey great thing about symbols, reality (of nepotism) doesn't matterThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A terrible legacy for women in the US - felony indictments hanging over the "first woman" liar.
#NeverHillary#StillSandersThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.