b/c that's a gov function. parties are not government bodies.
-
-
Replying to @derekwillis @mtracey
So b/c Dem party is a private org they can set arbitrary rules w/no journalist oversight? http://www.naacpldf.org/case/smith-v-allwright …
2 replies 8 retweets 15 likes -
constitutional questions are one thing. AP is trying to provide some oversight here by contacting SDs, imo.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis @mtracey
Derek, big fan of your work. I'm just surprised you'd defend AP's secrecy here given its crude impact on election.
3 replies 3 retweets 21 likes -
-
but sounds like we'll have to disagree on this, fellas. would love to see more transparency, but understand why not.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis @mtracey
"The work" here historically is one candidate helping to manufacture the news by getting supers to call news orgs.
1 reply 15 retweets 13 likes -
Lets not pretend for a second that AP had to lift mountains to get to this. HRC has huge paid team to whip supers.
5 replies 20 retweets 31 likes -
Replying to @lhfang @derekwillis
Withholding the identities without explanation was inevitably going to invite skepticism about timing / motive.
1 reply 5 retweets 15 likes -
they literally did same in 2008 (except on day of last primaries). don't recall the same outrage.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I don't have a time machine to express outrage about something that happened 8 years ago.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.