partly because you didn't try.
-
-
Replying to @derekwillis @ben_mishiev
It's not incumbent on me personally to do this, I am making a claim about the AP's lack of transparency.
4 replies 4 retweets 32 likes -
Apparently some data journalism is worthy -- but AP revealing their data is not.
1 reply 8 retweets 29 likes -
this is not a data journalism question. this is a news org calling people & reporting what they say.
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Thats just your opinion. This is data they've collected and are now concealing.
3 replies 3 retweets 15 likes -
ideally, yes, we'd have complete transparency. whether AP would be able to get a count with it is relevant.
2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @derekwillis @mtracey
Why not have every congressional leg vote undisclosed? Media can just call each lawmaker, declare which bill succeeds?
1 reply 8 retweets 19 likes -
b/c that's a gov function. parties are not government bodies.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @derekwillis @lhfang
Wrong, parties are quasi-governmental entities and not merely private clubs, as voluminous caselaw demonstrates.
1 reply 3 retweets 9 likes -
so that applies to opinions of party members before an election? those are mandatory public information?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Super delegates aren't just private party members, by taking on that role they enter the realm of public official.
-
-
and that realm mandates that they cannot offer private opinions?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.