Publicly uncommitted supers below. Not that many. Nothing stopping you from calling them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Democratic_Party_superdelegates,_2016 …https://twitter.com/mtracey/status/740225637848350720 …
-
-
Replying to @nickconfessore
Please explain the journalistic rationale for withholding the identities of the super delegates who "clinched" a nomination.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey @nickconfessore
Also, this might shock you, but not everyone has the same journalistic resources at their disposal as the AP.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey
Neither do we, which is why we subscribe to their service. But I'm not the one calling them liars.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @nickconfessore
I never called anyone a liar. I've raised concerns about the opaqueness of their process, one of which you apparently share.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey
Well, you are suggesting their results can't be trusted. There is no reason to think they are wrong and little risk that they are.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm suggesting the opacity of how the results were gleaned raises Qs. I agree with you, they should explain their reasoning.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.