You're attacking the messenger instead of grappling with the message.
-
-
Replying to @billscher @hitherebrian
I'm discerning that the message is being given in bad faith.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @hitherebrian
How about making an argument what is wrong with the advice instead of baselessly impugning motives?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @billscher @hitherebrian
Because I'm making a broader point about commentators who offer "advice" to candidates they don't favor.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
The motive is inseparable from the message. And I've been able to glean the motive, so it's not baseless.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey @hitherebrian
so I shld ignore yr oped on closed primaries bc it flacks for Bern? Or should I read in case I might learn something?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The answer is, I should read it! Because when I did, I learned something (even though I disagreed)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billscher @hitherebrian
I frequently learn from people I disagree with. The point is that transparency is ideal.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
I'm happy to admit that I voted for Bernie in the NY primary, in the interest of transparency.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey @hitherebrian
Though you did not share that information in your oped for readers to consider.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I wouldn't expect it to be shared in every piece. But when queried on Twitter or elsewhere, I'm happy to divulge.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.