And that speaks poorly of Dems if they wouldn't push for an investigation into transparency violations out of partisan loyalty.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
I agree with this point. Hypocritical of the Dems. And hubris by the Clintons (again). But still, how big an issue is this really?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrGregTowns
Normally lawbreaking is treated as a serious issue.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
it depends on the law, and who's breaking it. Not all lawbreaking is the same.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrGregTowns
Agreed, lawbreaking by the powerful is usually dealt with less harshly than lawbreaking by the non-powerful.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
which is why I assert this this email thing wouldn't have even been investigated if HRC weren't running for president.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrGregTowns
That's a counterfactual and we have no way of proving it. She *is* running though, so standards are rightly higher.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
I'm cool with it, as long as the media investigates Donald Trump's alleged illegal and/or unethical activities.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MrGregTowns
When Trump comes under FBI investigation I'll gladly call for attention to it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
HRC came under FBI investigation because of the media constantly reporting (parroting the GOP). Trump is just a joke to the media.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
You're asserting causality where none has been proven to exist.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
you're asserting guilt where none has been proven to exist. ;-)
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.