They've been insisting all along that this has no criminal component, so if that's the rationale, would be a nice big irony!
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @trevortimm
This was the IG inquiry, not the FBI inquiry. That's what they've been referencing w/r/t "no criminal component"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq @trevortimm
IG findings could be used in furtherance of the separate criminal inquiry.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @trevortimm
IG was pursuing a different legal analysis. Unless DOJ charges under 793f, IG findings largely not relevant 2 crim case
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @mtracey @trevortimm
Lets put it this way; given the FBI inquiry, I can reasonably envision advising an HRC-like client to decline IG mtg
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @BradMossEsq @trevortimm
Exactly, thus the irony in them repeatedly insisting that there was never a criminal component to these probes.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @trevortimm
And as I said, that comment was made w/r/t the FBI probe. Violating the FRA isn't a criminal matter.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BradMossEsq @trevortimm
If you decline to be interviewed to avoid future potential criminal liability, that's a "criminal component"
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @trevortimm
I don't know if that's why they declined, I'm simply saying its why I could envision advising a client to decline
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
And that would be a reasonable advisement on your part. Because there's a criminal component.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.