Still waiting for a neutral definition of "harassment" that wouldn't also encompass the efforts now underway to completely disemploy Bruenig
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
It's almost never about "harassment" per se with these people -- always about the underlying political / ideological / cultural conflict.
2 replies 3 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
focus always is on which personalities/groups are collectively responsible rather than how to address bad actions
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Trillburne
Yes, nothing about their reaction has anything to do with actually reducing the incidence of harm-causing harassment. Bad faith
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
harm-causing harassment usually qualifies as criminal harassment or stalking, but is almost never prosecuted. that's the problem
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @Trillburne
Because the justificatory bar for establishing criminal harm is rightly high. Many of these characters would want to lower it...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
...then claim shock when it's inevitably used against people they're in sympathy with, i.e. marginalized groups
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.