guess what: you're not a scientist. You have no basis to make any psychological diagnosis.
-
-
-
Replying to @ZaidJilani @adamjohnsonNYC
are you a certified medical professional and have you conducted personal interviews/assessments w/ the subject?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @adamjohnsonNYC
dude you have no idea what I'm saying anymore
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ZaidJilani @adamjohnsonNYC
I know what you're saying; you still can't diagnose someone w/ mental illness based on hunches gleaned from afar
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey @adamjohnsonNYC
if I'm reading you right you'd take someone with likely ptsd to a shooting range?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZaidJilani @adamjohnsonNYC
I have no idea how you arrived at that one.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @adamjohnsonNYC
I'm trying to show you the practical problems with letting ideology drive actions here
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZaidJilani @adamjohnsonNYC
There's no real "ideology" at work here. It's just practical, sensible harm mitigation.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey @adamjohnsonNYC
no bro its ideology. You think you're being sensitive but making it worse
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
No, declining to capriciously throw around pseudo-diagnoses does reduce overall harm in the long run.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey @adamjohnsonNYC
lol you can't look at this without ideology its tough
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.