Social media is now an ineluctable part of the electoral process. So maybe 2016 really is nastier, in totality.https://twitter.com/danpfeiffer/status/732942183997673473 …
-
-
Operatives associated with that race have an interest in mythologizing it, so they can maintain this air of battle-hardened sagacity
-
Irony: these Dem operatives tell war stories about how nasty that race was, yet gloss over all of HRC's anti-Obama slurs as irrelevant.
-
The two biggest proponents of the Bill Ayers conspiracy in Spring 2008 were Sean Hannity and Hillary. Yet she now pays no price for this.
-
Social media amplifies already-existing sentiment, but it also generates new sentiment. Somebody called me a friggin' "Bernie Bro" last week
-
That happened in real life, at a Clinton event. Social media isn't just one exogenous variable, it suffuses the whole discourse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The establishment democrats' desire to kick Sanders' Supporters is stronger than when they kicked out the anti-war faction in '68.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
one candidate is fucking up their gravy train. Obama was tight with Wall Street in 2008.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.