You can't argue that closed primaries are bad because they limit voter turnout, then embrace caucuseshttp://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/04/jane-sanders-pledged-delegates-221934 …
-
-
Replying to @billscher
@billscher Closed primaries are bad because they disenfranchise voters. Not quite the same principle with caucuses.http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/michael-tracey-n-y-election-law-disenfranchises-thousands-article-1.2600065 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@billscher I don't defend caucuses either, but for slightly different reasons.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @billscher
@billscher I wonder how many Democratic proponents of closed primaries realize that they're on the side of SCOTUS conservatives c. 19731 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @billscher
@billscher Yeah, but the dissent also acknowledges party affiliation is fluid and calls for greater legal accommodation of that.
5:09 PM - 14 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.