Shocker: Washington Post thinks the Washington Post's Sanders coverage wasn't unfairhttps://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/has-the-washington-post-been-too-hard-on-bernie-sanders-this-week/ …
-
-
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
1) Framing is wrong, I limited it to post-debate spin 2) I said "ran" this includes AP 3) negative *framing* was my scope
@callumborchers5 replies 7 retweets 39 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
Best is when
@callumborchers says Sanders debate performance was "widely panned" & ONLY links to,kid u not, Marcottepic.twitter.com/YhszHhHNhF
7 replies 38 retweets 89 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
This again is the problem w/ pundit echo chamber: "widely" can me a handful of likeminded media types subject to groupthink. Utterly vacuous
4 replies 13 retweets 47 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
WaPo sent the B team to debunk my piece. Now it's time for the counter debunk. This has been the best birthday ever.
14 replies 12 retweets 77 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.