@charlescwcooke @michaelbd Latinos, defense hawks, social conservatives/disaffected Evangelicals, some libertarians, some high-finance.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@michaelbd Give me a comparison. How would this differ from, say, Rubio?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Rubio is a creature of the more traditional "conservative movement" which limits his ability to coalition-build.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@michaelbd Which of those groups you mentioned in your previous tweet would he not win in consequence?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Disaffected Evangelicals / working class whites would probably be the big one -- a major factor in Romney's loss1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@michaelbd Interesting. Why do you think they would prefer Cruz to Rubio or anyone else?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Because Cruz can convincingly do the whole Joel Osteen thing, whereas Rubio cannot. He would come off as phony.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Not totally. Some substance too. Again, Rubio is a product of the "three-legged-stool" -- Cruz transcends that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd In other words, I think Cruz and Rubio have sincere differences on hugely consequential matters of policy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlescwcooke @michaelbd Rubio is just putting different lipstick on the pig. Cruz is a completely new farm animal.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
@SenTedCruz is the real deal#CruzMissile2016@mtracey@charlescwcooke@michaelbd0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.