In which @michaelbd doesn’t quite come out and say “Cruz is unelectable.” So I will: Cruz is unelectable. http://ccwc.me/1nKwrSc
-
-
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd I can absolutely imagine a voting bloc of "Cruz Democrats" -- easily. He's that good.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@michaelbd I know. And I think you make an excellent case. I just can’t see it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Cruz's strength is that he can forge a coalition that would transcend the failed "three-legged-stool" approach.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Latinos, defense hawks, social conservatives/disaffected Evangelicals, some libertarians, some high-finance.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@michaelbd Give me a comparison. How would this differ from, say, Rubio?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@michaelbd Rubio is a creature of the more traditional "conservative movement" which limits his ability to coalition-build.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlescwcooke @michaelbd Rubio would be beholden to entrenched "three-legged-stool" interests -- Cruz doesn't have to countenance them.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.