@mtracey I couldn’t agree with you more.
-
-
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@mtracey Wasn't a lockdown. It was a shelter-in-place request. No legal consequences attached to people going outside2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeveyIsLaw
@charlescwcooke@mtracey Please find me a person who left their house outside a few blocks in Watertown and was arrested. Didn't happen2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LeveyIsLaw
@LeveyIsLaw@mtracey The first challenge here would be to find a person who left their house!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@mtracey I would introduce you to my mom, who went outside to walk the dog and went to her bakery1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeveyIsLaw
@LeveyIsLaw@mtracey Okay. I shouldn’t have turned this into a debate by anecdote. My mistake. Overall, place was a ghost town.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke@mtracey 1/2 By the choice of the scared-shitless citizenry. Granted, that says something bad about our psyche, but 1/21 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeveyIsLaw
@LeveyIsLaw@mtracey I respect the legal distinction. But that choice was not apropos of nothing.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @charlescwcooke
@charlescwcooke No argument there. But@mtracey said it was unconstitutional, which, given the lack of state action, is incorrect1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LeveyIsLaw
@LeveyIsLaw@mtracey I don’t think it was necessarily illegal.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@charlescwcooke @LeveyIsLaw The question hasn't been litigated.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.