Still think Tea Partiers are shills for corporations? http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/15/business/for-businesses-and-the-gop-a-cantor-effect.html …
-
-
Replying to @ThaddeusRussell
@ThaddeusRussell Many are, some aren't. So not a particularly fruitful question.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThaddeusRussell
@ThaddeusRussell He has no meaningful affiliation with any Tea Party groups, and national Tea Party groups spent $0 on his campaign1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThaddeusRussell
@ThaddeusRussell I'm not privy to any evidence for that. Either way, "Tea Party" has long outlived its usefulness as a political designation1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ThaddeusRussell
@ThaddeusRussell I'll take a look. But I'm pretty sure even Cantor has identified with the "Tea Party." Term is utterly devoid of meaning.
12:31 PM - 14 Jun 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.