.@mtracey i totally agree with that but I dont have to identify her as the kind of feminism i believe in
-
-
Replying to @ZaidJilani
@ZaidJilani Yeah that's one thing, but to say she's "not a feminist" just invites confusion1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@ZaidJilani But to say 'anyone can self identify as something and that makes it so' also invites confusion4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @DavidKaib
@DavidKaib@mtracey because thats what upper class white people consider their struggle, but not vast majority of women in world1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZaidJilani
@ZaidJilani@DavidKaib So she subscribes to a strain of "feminism" you object to -- doesn't mean she's "not a feminist," no formal criteria1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DavidKaib yeah I mean there isn't an admissions test.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZaidJilani
@ZaidJilani@DavidKaib Yeah, my ultimate point is that quibbling over labels = a fool's errand, I remember having the same debate re: Palin3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DavidKaib one area where i really try not to do it is religion, because thats way too broad1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ZaidJilani
@ZaidJilani@DavidKaib political ideology just as broad & nebulous as religious ideology -- you'd run into virtually the same problems2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DavidKaib well religion people have a right to define themselves as they wish and it doesnt have huge consequences to let them1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ZaidJilani @DavidKaib I don't think political and religious ideology are as neatly separable as some like to think, but that's another Q.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.