There's no good reason to believe that "expanded background checks" would've prevented Elliot Rodger from buying guns http://reason.com/archives/2014/05/28/gun-controls-false-promise …
-
-
Replying to @Bleak_Morn
@Bleak_Morn I don't know about that, but it's clear that he had no disqualifying attributes that would surface in a background check.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @Bleak_Morn
@Bleak_Morn True. Closest recent analog strikes me as James Holmes, perhaps Lanza as well.
9:43 AM - 28 May 2014
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.