@DonnyDiggins @Mike_hugs I don't know of anyone who actually thinks that, but if you say so.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey Isn't that a shorthand for the claim about incrementalism? People wouldn't be able to obtain the info. without him?@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs So anyone who acknowledges the virtue of the current approach is some kind of "incrementalist" sycophant?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey I guess in order to make that call I'd have to know what you think is so great about the current approach.@Mike_hugs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs The current approach has spawned diplomatic crises, congressional action, strong cross-ideological coalitions...4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey These crises could be accelerated with a wider array of people processing and writing about the docs' information.@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs You could just as easily argue that releasing so much info at once would cause an overload & decelerate the crises1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins Yeah, and those revelations came after Wikileaks worked in concert with major media.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DonnyDiggins I think we can leave it at that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.