@Mike_hugs @DonnyDiggins Snowden himself demanded that the docs not be dumped en masse. You're saying GG should violate their agreement?
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey First, this is the only argument GG has re: dumps. He pretends it isn't, like incrementalism is better. It's not.@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs Even if this **were** his only argument (not so) you'd still be obliged to address it.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey Third, the fear of losing journalistic 'objectivity' is a fear of losing credibility with those GG himself calls hacks.@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs Given that GG relentlessly mocks "objectivity" I'd hoped the blinding sarcasm of my previous tweet would be obvious2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey Some people think the most important thing is having GG on cable news. You're not one of those. Good.@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs I don't know of anyone who actually thinks that, but if you say so.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey Isn't that a shorthand for the claim about incrementalism? People wouldn't be able to obtain the info. without him?@Mike_hugs1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DonnyDiggins
@DonnyDiggins@Mike_hugs So anyone who acknowledges the virtue of the current approach is some kind of "incrementalist" sycophant?3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey I guess in order to make that call I'd have to know what you think is so great about the current approach.@Mike_hugs2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DonnyDiggins @Mike_hugs Which is to say: there is clearly value to the current approach.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.