@DGisSERIOUS Oh, I thought you meant that an intervention tomorrow would stop 100k *additional* deaths.
-
-
Replying to @DGisSERIOUS
@DGisSERIOUS yeah, I've yet to hear a convincing case that intervening now makes sense. Argument from "preserving U.S. credibility" is bogus1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DGisSERIOUS
@DGisSERIOUS And yet it's somehow the centerpiece of every pro-intervention op-ed I've read today -- a really warped mentality1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DGisSERIOUS
@DGisSERIOUS Anne-Marie Slaughter also focused on it http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/obama-should-remember-rwanda-as-he-weighs-action-in-syria/2013/04/26/08f77c20-ae8a-11e2-8bf6-e70cb6ae066e_story.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DGisSERIOUS
@DGisSERIOUS A case for how intervention could plausibly prevent further civilian deaths w/o worsening the conflict wld be more persuasive1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DGisSERIOUS Still writing / fleshing out my thoughts on this though. Miserable situation all around, obv
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.