@joecarter @DanielLarison @mtracey @amconmag Re: Johnson, he represents those in favor of limited gov./constitutionalism better than Romney
-
-
Replying to @DanielLarison
@DanielLarison@mtracey@amconmag Refusing to protect the innocent unborn and supporting radicalism (SSM) is not a better representation.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joecarter
@joecarter@DanielLarison Strengthening the institution of marriage for all Americans, as Sullivan has written, is a conservative principle1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DanielLarison No, no, no it's not. Radically redefining the humanity's oldest institution is the furthest thing from conservative.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joecarter
@joecarter@DanielLarison Hence the disconnect between@firstthingsmag and a great many young traditional conservatives.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DanielLarison@firstthingsmag The disconnect is with you're thinking SSM supporters can be 'young traditional conservatives."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joecarter
@joecarter@DanielLarison@firstthingsmag "No True Traditional Conservative" -- reminds me of a popular logical fallacy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DanielLarison@firstthingsmag And No True Philosopher really believes the No True Scotsman fallacy is a real logical fallacy.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @joecarter
@joecarter@DanielLarison@firstthingsmag David Hume would likely disagree1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@DanielLarison@firstthingsmag I think you're thinking of Antony Flew. Is "no true atheist believes in God" a logical fallacy?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@joecarter @DanielLarison @firstthingsmag No, I'm thinking of Hume.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.