@michaelbd These are always exceptional cases. There are bound to be errors. Larger trends indicate no major loss of religious liberty.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@cubancuervo I think both are OK in different contexts. I usually use "marriage equality."Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd You aware of any problems in Connecticut, whose law includes various assurances of religious liberty preservation?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd OK. I can acknowledge there may be overreach at times. Broader point is pro-SSM people generally do not seek to destroy liberty. -
@mtracey@michaelbd that overreach will continue. Even a small number may seek to bring lawsuits just because they can. Some will win. - 12 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@cubancuervo Yeah I don't think there is any meaningful consensus on which term is preferableThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd "Must accept" for their own good. I won't force anyone to accept anything, of course.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd And they "must accept" it as a matter of law, not of morality. -
@mtracey@michaelbd I guess anything can be accepted, except a role for Mormons in national politics. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@matthewschmitz My main point is that there are ways to both protect religious liberty and have legal same-sex marriage in the USAThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@matthewschmitz Whether or not they accept it, they should accept its reality, otherwise they will flounder in the darkness.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@matthewschmitz Well I hope more follow your lead. Others can take solace in the fact that SSM will instill socially-conservative values.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@matthewschmitz The ACLU and other protectors of liberty will make sure you are fully allowed to keep saying thatThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd Should a private business be allowed to refuse services to a customer on the ground of owners' moral aversion to homosexuality?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@PhillipsPasha@brianmdoherty@michaelbd Now that I could get behindThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@SedLibera@matthewschmitz I prefer the more modern conception of marital bonds that Dreher writes against.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd@mtracey But everyone knew that wasn't going anywhere.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd I couldn't ? more.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@michaelbd Not my point. Only that the example of that absurd law is not terribly helpful because it was a statement more than anything.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.