@ToryAnarchist Even Romney's own foreign policy advisors seem befuddled about where he stands.
-
-
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@ToryAnarchist And it depends on what advisers we're talking about. His hawkish advisers aren't objecting to what he's said1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielLarison
@DanielLarison@ToryAnarchist This NYT piece suggests a degree of befuddlement: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/08/us/politics/romney-remains-vague-on-foreign-policy-details.html?pagewanted=2&partner=rss&emc=rss&pagewanted=all&_r=0 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@ToryAnarchist That reflects the extent to which Romney has ignored a lot of them during the campaign.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielLarison
@DanielLarison@ToryAnarchist Yes, and it seems some are annoyed (possibly confused?) enough to complain to the NYT.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mtracey
@mtracey@ToryAnarchist Sure, but there have been Romney FP advisers leaking to Sanger for mos. I suspect he's rejecting their views1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielLarison
@DanielLarison I wonder if John Bolton is behind any of the leaks.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanielLarison
@DanielLarison From the NYT piece: "The faction around Bolton [...] expressed its deep unhappiness when Robert Zoellick was appointed..."2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@DanielLarison Going forward they should leak to TAC instead :)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.